eISSN: 2500-7106 / ISSN: 0123-2576
Register
Login
Medicinay Laboratorio
2025, Volume: 29, Issue:3-4 : 78-82 doi: 10.36384/01232576.782
Research Article
Off-Pump vs On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG): Comparative Outcomes
 ,
1
Microbiólogo y Bioanalista, Estudiante de Maestría. Grupo Reproducción, Grupo Centauro, Investigación Universitaria, Universidad de Antioquia. Medellín, Colombi
2
Médico especialista en Ginecología y Obstetricia. Ginecólogo y Mastólogo, Clínica Las Américas. Medellín, Colombi
Received
Nov. 10, 2025
Revised
Nov. 28, 2025
Accepted
Dec. 13, 2025
Published
Dec. 29, 2025
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains the gold standard surgical treatment for multivessel coronary artery disease. Conventional on-pump CABG utilizes cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), whereas off-pump CABG (OPCAB) avoids CPB and is performed on a beating heart. The comparative safety and efficacy of these techniques remain debated. Materials and Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted among 120 patients undergoing elective CABG. Patients were divided into two groups: On-pump CABG (n=60) and Off-pump CABG (n=60). Perioperative variables, postoperative complications, mortality, ICU stay, hospital stay, and graft patency were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square test and independent t-test with p<0.05 considered significant.Results:Off-pump CABG demonstrated significantly lower incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation, reduced blood transfusion requirement, shorter ICU stay, and decreased ventilation time. However, complete revascularization rate and long-term graft patency were slightly higher in on-pump CABG. No significant difference in 30-day mortality was observed. Conclusion:Off-pump CABG is associated with reduced perioperative morbidity and faster recovery, while on-pump CABG provides more complete revascularization. Surgical expertise and patient selection remain crucial in determining optimal approach.
Keywords
License
Copyright (c) Medicinay Laboratorio
Creative Commons Attribution License Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All papers should be submitted electronically. All submitted manuscripts must be original work that is not under submission at another journal or under consideration for publication in another form, such as a monograph or chapter of a book. Authors of submitted papers are obligated not to submit their paper for publication elsewhere until an editorial decision is rendered on their submission. Further, authors of accepted papers are prohibited from publishing the results in other publications that appear before the paper is published in the Journal unless they receive approval for doing so from the Editor-In-Chief.
Medicinay Laboratorio open access articles are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license lets the audience to give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made and if they remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute contributions under the same license as the original.
Recommended Articles
Lupus eritematoso sistémico
211-223
PDF
Impact of Severe Pre-eclampsia and Eclampsia on Fetomaternal Outcomes: A retrospective study
14-17
PDF
The role of the microbiology laboratory in clinical practice
295-296
PDF
Balance of the last three years: Adaptation and evolution towards a new stage
11-12
PDF
Medicinay Laboratorio journal thumbnail
Volume: 29, Issue:3-4
Citations
66 Views
373 Downloads
Share this article
Editora Médica Colombiana SA / Universidad de Antioquia
Certified Continuing Medical Education Program (PEMCC)
Email: submission@medicinaylaboratorio.com
Carrera 43C #5-33 Medellín, Colombia 050022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36384/issn.0123-2576
Open Access Publication
Magazone managed by Biteca